The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which was established with the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty in 1949, is cracking. And those cracks appear to be getting larger after NATO nations defy President Donald Trump, refusing any help with the evil Iranian Regime ──
01-04-26Trump to Allies Refusing to Back Iran Op: Fight for Your Own Oil—US Won't Protect YouMOSCOW (Sputnik) - The United States will no longer provide assistance to protect the interests of those countries that refused to support the military operation against Iran, US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday.“All of those countries that can't get jet fuel because of the Strait of Hormuz, like the United Kingdom, which refused to get involved in the decapitation of Iran, I have a suggestion for you: Number 1, buy from the U.S., we have plenty, and Number 2, build up some delayed courage, go to the Strait, and just TAKE IT. You'll have to start learning how to fight for yourself; the U.S.A. won’t be there to help you anymore, just like you weren’t there for us. Iran has been, essentially, decimated. The hard part is done. Go get your own oil!” Trump said on Truth Social.28-03-26Trump’s Skepticism Shook NATO: Iran War May Shatter ItThe US president “essentially views NATO as an obsolete relic of the Cold War,” and allies’ refusal to help in Iran demonstrates that the US-European defense dynamic as it has existed since the late 1940s “is no longer necessary,” says Joe Siracusa, dean of Global Futures at Australia’s Curtin University. ...Washington “wants NATO naval forces to clear the Strait of Hormuz, which is a nearly impossible task while active fighting is going on,” Siracusa explains. Not to mention the fact that Iran posed no “imminent threat” to the alliance, and the Europeans know it.
Of course, we now know that the evil regime was lying about their ballistic missile range (Surprise, Surprise!), their missiles could (and can if they have any left) reach large swaths of Europe!
Let us think on this from 2017: From George Friedman of Geopolitical Futures ──
“For 25 years, the fundamental questions regarding NATO were… from the American point of view, … First, with the Soviet Union gone, what is NATO’s purpose? Second, how does NATO serve the American national interest? Third, given the fact that the EU has almost as large a GDP and almost 200 million more people than the U.S., why isn’t Europe’s collective contribution to NATO’s military capability larger than the U.S.’s? … I don’t simply mean money, but a suitably large, trained and equipped force able to support the wars that are being fought now.The automatic answer to the first question is that NATO’s purpose is to guarantee its members’ security. On the second question, it can’t be argued that NATO has served American interests since 1991. For the last 15 years, the U.S. has been engaged in wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and other Muslim countries. Whether wise or not, these wars have been waged to different degrees under both Republican and Democratic administrations. NATO is a military alliance, and one of its members, the United States, has been involved in wars for 15 years. NATO, as an institution, has not devoted anywhere near the military force it could afford to any of these wars. …Someone was going to point out that NATO is obsolete. Trump happened to enjoy saying it.” 1
NATO’s actions when “push comes to shove” or “when the rubber meets the road” ── whatever idiom you wish to use ── should be showing the U.S. that NATO is not reliable. “It is not NATO’s war,” said a spokesperson for German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. “NATO is an alliance to defend the alliance area. The United States did not consult us before this war, and so we believe this is not a matter for NATO or the German government.” 2
An Italian Far-Left Anti-Semite, Maurizio Blondet, recently wrote ──
>> He has published several articles against the “Judeo-Zionist.” In his books and articles, Blondet insists that it is the Jew behind the “military-industrial, oil, political, and Jewish lobbies and conspiracies like that of September 11.” 3
The chaos that the US is sowing, it seems, always has a common denominator. The crisis with Ukraine, at the end of the day, from the US point of view was nothing more than the most damaging thing possible for Europe and its economy. And now that the EU has managed to obtain a rebalancing of energy sources, building regasification plants, a disaster has broken out that prevents LNG from flowing from the Gulf countries.What still needs to happen, exactly, to make it clear that the chaos sown by the US serves above all to put Europe and its economy in difficulty? Every time the European Union tries to build an autonomous corridor – energy or trade – "something else" happens: a few days before the treaty with Mercosur is finally signed, after twenty-six years of negotiations, the attack on Venezuela begins, with all the set of political instability and risks on the supply of raw materials and agri-food from South America.Now that the EU has set up a relatively stable flow of gas and energy investments to and from the Middle East, under the new India-Middle East-Europe corridors, disaster is brewing right there, with yet another crisis threatening shipping lanes, insurance, risk premiums and energy-based industrial plans at predictable prices. …The next step is to acknowledge that the USA is no longer “friends”, nor even simple noisy competitors. From the European point of view, the United States has become an enemy in the technical sense of the term: a power that pursues economic, energy and military policy lines that are structurally hostile to the survival of European industry and autonomy, from the de facto sabotage of our energy corridors to the continuous pressure to buy their weapons, their technological standards and their cultural narrative.In many buildings in Berlin this has already been clear for years, where the USA is defined without mincing words as “military allies but economic and financial enemies”; the problem is that in Brussels and in the Latin capitals they continue to pretend that it is only a matter of misunderstandings between partners.It is time to call a spade a spade: Washington pursues a coherent plan to erode Europe's ability to act as an autonomous pole, and the forced “Americanization” of our cultural and media elites is integral to this process, because a continent that thinks with American categories is already half-colonized without the need for Marines. …(https://www.maurizioblondet.it/un-genocida-minaccia-roma-di-atomica/, translated into English, underline and boldness added for emphasis).
Well … Maurizio, tell us how you really feel!
Yes, sadly, consumed with utter hate, there are those in Europe who feel (believe and feel are two separate things) that the United States of America is intentionally pursuing policies that will help “push” Europe down. Well … to use Maurizio’s own words, “It’s time to call a spade a spade.” Surely, President Donald Trump is saying, ‘Act now or get out of the way!’
More and more countries in Europe are concluding amongst themselves that they must take action in uniting their own militaries.
Sadly, given time, this will not be good for the United States, per-Daniel 11:39, which is also consistent with Lamentations 1:1-2.
Now, while NATO leaders publicly continue to “support” their member nations of the United States of America, the United Kingdom, as well as Canada ── a soon-coming seventh resurrection of a “United States of Europe” led by the Catholic Church will betray them. □
1 Friedman, G., NATO and the United States, Jan. 18, 2017 - https://geopoliticalfutures.com/nato-and-the-united-states-3, Retrieved 2 April 2026
2 Croft, A. & Maddox, D., ‘Not NATO’s war’: Germany and UK reject Trump’s call for help in Strait of Hormuz, Independent, 17 March 2026.
3. "Maurice Blondet." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Nov 17, 2025. Apr 2, 2026.
No comments:
Post a Comment